This branch of CNI, unlike the others, is complicated by claims of official government disinformation and cover-up. Moreover, since the mid-1960s, the "UFO" field has gradually come to be dominated by claims of alien abduction of humans, and also includes claims of channeled or telepathic extraterrestrial contact.
Skeptics insist all such claims are absurdly far-fetched. Yet, most astronomers and astrophysicists today agree on the virtual certainty of intelligent life elsewhere in our galaxy. SETI, or the scientific Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, employs radio telescopes and massive computers to search the noise of deep space for intelligent signals. It seems that little separates the assumptions of SETI researchers and UFO researchers, except the idea that "they" can, and do, visit the earth.
While the "Extraterrestrial Hypothesis" has been the most popular UFO theory among enthusiasts, ISCNI shares with researchers like Jacques Vallee the view that UFO-related phenomena are too varied, complex and strange to fit a simple "E.T." explanation. "E.T." might well be involved -- but so might extra-dimensional, extra-temporal, or super-psychic phenomena beyond our imagination. Another notion worth considering is that human technology may have created wonders far stranger than most believe. Did "we" build that UFO? Of course, the human mind is also capable of wondrous flights of fancy, not to mention self-deception. All in all, knowing as little as we do, ISCNI assumes we have a great deal yet to discover.
Angels are often pictured as fluffy, winged and feminine; but experience tells a different story. As often as not, angels seem to show up as ordinary looking people, both women and men -- ordinary, that is, until they do something miraculously unexpected and then disappear without trace or explanation. In their coming and going, the most important fact from the human experiencer's perspective seems to be that life takes a sudden turn for the better, whether because a danger has been diverted, or glad tidings have been given, or despair has been lifted, or life itself has been restored. Rescue from certain disaster is a common theme; healing of terminal illness another; the gift of comfort and courage in terrible times yet another. Whether anything truly "angelic" is going on here remains a question beyond proving; but there can be no doubt that millions of people are touched and moved by what they perceive as angels, and that is a noteworthy phenomenon in itself.
Of course, not all angels are seen as good. A prevailing theory among religious philosophers and theologians is that angels, like humans, represent a created order of beings possessing free will and capable of error and imperfection. Satan, the prince of hell, was said to have originated among the radiant seraphim, but chose a path of willful self-aggrandisement and was cast down, taking with him a third of the heavenly host. Today, demons and devils reveal themselves most clearly in the grotesquerie accompanying exorcism; indeed, the casting out of evil spirits is hardly less common now than in the Middle Ages.
This part of the CNI spectrum is not confined to angels alone, however. Closely related, conceptually at least, are legions of nature spirits and "little people" -- sylphs, faeries, trolls, devas, elementals -- reported in many forms, by many names, in the traditions of nearly all cultures. Shamanic practitioners and spiritual adepts learn how to deal with such beings, and how, when necessary, to drive them away. Though most such creatures seem diminutive, among the devas are said to be great beings of light and power, charged with the maintenance of other lifeforms, even whole kingdoms of life, as well as large pieces of geography, from mountains and oceans up to and including the earth itself. Again, western science finds no proof that such beings exist; yet for millions of people, the angelic realm is no less real than death and taxes.
Proceed to ISCNI Angels Gallery
Meanwhile, actual breakthroughs have been made with several species of great apes, including chimps and gorillas. The mouth cavity in apes lacks certain features required for vocal speech, so researchers don't expect any ape to talk (how odd, in this light, that many parrots, though "bird-brains," can articulate words perfectly). However, a number of chimps have learned several hundred words of vocabulary expressed with American Sign Language, and have shown the ability to initiate communication involving hundreds of phrases of three or more words, with a wide range of intelligible meanings. In other words, these chimps can communicate at nearly the level of an average three year old human child. Similarly, a number of gorillas have learned both American Sign Language and a computer-aided communication system that synthesizes vocalization when word icons are chosen on an interactive screen. One gorilla named Koko is reported to be able to comprehend 2,000 different words.
Experiments with apes show that language capability is not strictly limited to humans; however, the structure of the ape brain suggests that ape-human communication will never be more than rudimentary. Prospects are even less with other terrestrial life-forms: the next most intelligent group, dogs, can clearly learn to recognize a variety of vocal messages, but are not considered candidates for real two-way communication. But the story may be different with cetaceans, if the interspecies chasm can somehow be bridged. In all likelihood, great brilliance, humor, even music and poetry reside within these gentle alien seafarers. The struggle to communicate with them might well teach us hugely important lessons for communicating with other aliens yet to be discovered.
[ISCNI Non-Human Earth Intelligence Gallery is under construction. Thank you for your patience.]
Asimov's sanguine view of a future in which humans and artifically intelligent entities peacefully and productively co-exist contrasts sharply with the horrific visions of the Terminator, where super-intelligent machines almost succeed in exterminating humanity. Hardly less disturbing are the intelligent machines of benign design that somehow run amok, epitomized by HAL in Kubrick's classic film "2001."
But will machines ever really cross the line from the brilliant stupidity of today's best computers to true, and potentially overwhelming, intelligence? The question is hotly debated, but more and more experts seem agreed: true machine intelligence could be upon us very soon.
The challenges are formidible. Machines today can fluently mimic reason within artifically narrow problem environments (they can, for instance, play chess at the grand master level), but not in wide open space where anything goes. For the equivalent of sustained, general purpose reason -- say, the level of reason normal to a three year old child -- a machine would need massively parallel data processing on a scale hardly conceived -- until now. As recently as late 1994, breakthroughs in so-called "DNA computing" raise the possibility of super computers based not on microelectronics, but on molecular biology. Among their several advantages, DNA computers could be a billion times more energy efficient than conventional computers, use just a trillionth of the space to store information, and most importantly, be so massively parallel that just one of them, no bigger than a refrigerator, could perform more operations at once than all the computers in the world today, working together. Is this the needed breakthrough? Quite possibly; and if not, some other will likely be found before long.
The consequences are easily as formidible as the achievement itself. For, by the time a machine can reason on its own even as well as three year old child, it will already have at its disposal (if human designers are so inclined) the options of superhuman senses, superhuman reflexes, superhuman strength, superhuman indifference to hostile environments, super armaments and locomotion of any conceivable description -- the list goes on. All the body functions are already accounted for in heroic proportion, awaiting only a worthy mind.
Today, there seems no reasonable doubt that such creations will arrive soon. But there is also no reason to believe they will be any more benevolent than the humans who call them forth. Of all the aliens we can conceive, these may well be the most worrisome.
[ISCNI Artificial Intelligence Gallery is under construction. Thank you for your patience.]